Digital Show and Tell #1

On Monday, October 16th I shared The International Encyclopedia of the First World War. I believe this website is a good digital humanities tool because it offers a variety of ways to process the information of the website. These categories being Timeline, Themes, and Regions. Each area brings you to a different approach to the same content across the website. For example, if you were to search for ‘Woodrow Wilson’ in each area, each different category would bring up the same information but in a different format. Also, within each category, there are many links to different connections within the website. This feature of the website is very important to me because many people learn in different ways.

In evaluating the website, the creators have a clear focus being World War One. Second, the creators did a good job on making the website accessible to different types of audiences, they took into account that those coming to the site most likely do not have much information within this subject area. Lastly, the website does a good job at documenting their processes and gives a background to the creating of the website. While this information is limited, they recognize that some areas of the website can be expanded.

https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/home/

Syrian Crisis – Digital Show and Tell

Concepts & Content:

  • Focused on Syrian Crisis, which started in 2010.
  • Layout is similar, very closely related to “Cascade” in Story Maps.
  • Their goal is to bring awareness to the Syrian Crisis.

Design & Technique:

  • Similar to ArcMap/ Story Maps, but they’re not all the same type of page/slide. Each scroll has different material shown.
  • Information is meaningful, straightforward and simple.
  • Information is not persuasive but rather, informative and includes everything needed for background knowledge of the Syrian Crisis.

Collaborative & Documentation:

  • Simple, minimalistic.
  • Powered by Google and UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees).

https://searchingforsyria.org/en/what-was-syria-like-before-the-war/

Digital Show and Tell – DESMOS.com

Monday, October 9th, I shared a tool that is used for math called desmos.com. Though not directly related to the humanities, it is a tool that can be used to assist understanding and learning of the humanities. One of our criteria talked about using the tool in a productive way, and I think tool does just that. It is a powerful tool and resource for teachers to pull in ideas to help further students’ understanding. In addition to that, it is user-friendly and relatively simple. Practically anyone who knows how to use a computer knows how to use this. It holds all the qualities of a graphing calculator but goes even beyond that to graph lines where could be multiple constants. I realize this is not a website that brings in humanity topics into its uses but it is a resource for connecting humanities to mathematics.

 

desmos.com

The Art Story

The Art Story website has to be one of my favorite websites that thoroughly explains modern movements that helped shape art around the United States. They have a clear goal and vision of: “a world where the ideas and aspirations behind the wondrous art are accessible to anyone to explore and be inspired by.” They want this to be their main goal, because so often the people who are apart of the institutions of the Art world, do not take the time to educate people who do not know a lot about modern art (which is a large majority of Americans, and the world).

Throughout the website the authors and writers who work for the Art Story identify key movements and summarize the movements, have background context, and identify which artists were influential in that movement during it’s time. They even have large timelines that identify when the movements happened, or even when different sculptures happen that is known by the masses.

The creators of the website have made it clear and easy to navigate through on desktop and even mobile. This is important to be able to access it on mobile as it allows you to take The Art Story to art museums and learn more about artists and the time periods that people walk through at the museums. Because so often, viewers are not able to fully grasp the concepts behind particular art pieces, because they want to know more about a piece. This website allows the viewers to know more about the piece, and even continue to look and search around more easily for different artists that they may recognize.

This website is for the masses, and for the educated – because truly we can all continue to learn more about something that we may not fully understand.

You can view the site here: http://www.theartstory.org/

Show and Tell

Show and Tell: Civil War Washington

Civil War Washington is a digital center from University of Nebraska Lincoln, that examines multiple perspectives from the national capital during the Civil War. There are multiple views of political, social, cultural, and medical/scientific positions in this time period. This project is divided into multiple sections; Introduction, Data, Maps, Texts, Visual Works, and Interpretations. Then on the bottom there is availability for About, FAQ, Participants, Rights and Usage, Contact, and Blog.

The first link you are able to click on is the Introduction. There’s a brief paragraph giving an overview of what the overall database is about. It also gives the Introductory Materials, like the Emancipation Petitions, which gives historical context; Medical and Surgical Cases, which shows the sources and methods they used at this time; Journalism in Washington, which shows the importance of hospital newspapers, they all gave information on the patients and staff; Organization of Hospitals in the Department of Washington, which shows the placement of hospitals in that area; and Washington known as the Strategic, Symbolic, and Scientific Capital. Then their Grant Narrative, “Civil War Washington Collaborative Research Grant, which gives them the right to research on this certain topic. And lastly their Conference Paper, Civil War Washington: An Experiment in Freedom, Integration, and Constraint. This was delivered at the Annual Conference of the Alliance of Digital Humanities Organizations, in June 2011.

The next page is the Data. It allows you to research people, places, organizations, documents, and events that have connection to the Civil War. It all has been researched by the creators of Civil War Washington, you’re able to search and browse this information. There’s also an option to download some documents, like the 1860 Census, Ward 1 Data; GIS Data, a geodatabase and shapefile; GIS Data, from KML; and L’Ouverture Hospital Register Data.

After that is the Maps page, mapmaking and cartography were very important during this time period. The map is set up for various users, beginners to experts. There are multiple tools that can manipulate the map, that come with in depth instructions. You can look at the overview, add or remove layers, view the legend, change the basemap, search for features, see more information about a place, activate time-aware data and use the time slider, draw, write, or measure on the map, set and use bookmarks, and print the current map view.

After that, there’s the Text page that gives multiple forms of writings from that time period. There are multiple petitions, specifically the Compensated Emancipation Act of April 16, 1862. It gave record of how thousands of slaves felt once they gained freedom. Medical cases, that give basic information on the different injuries, illnesses, and deaths. Letters from Washington, which were written by residents and guests that explained their view of the Capital. And newspapers, which also gave information on the hospitals; names of patients, medical staff, and subscribers, hospital statistics, news, and editorials, and presenting short stories, poetry, and sketches. With this page, you’re also allowed to search by using key words.

Then there is the Visual Works page, which gave photographs, lithographs, drawings, and other visuals from this time period. You are able to look at multiple people like Harrison Allen, Edwin Bentley, and some others. You can also look at different buildings, which are hospitals in that area. There’s also an “Other” section that has a picture of the 4th Colored Infantry, as well as a photo of the Capital without the dome.

The last page you’re able to click on is Interpretations. A lot of the creators of this project wrote essays on the experience of creating it or the database itself. Some examples are, “Civil War Washington: The City and the State” by: Susan C. Lawrence, Elizabeth Lorang, Brett Barney, and Kenneth M. Price, and “Developing Civil War Washington” by: Katherine L. Walter, Elizabeth Lorang, Stacy Rickel, and Karin Dalziel.

My overall experience with Civil War Washington has been great, the database is easy to navigate, it has useful information, and it has all the aspects to make it credible. There is the main page that has each section shown in the middle, making it easy to go from one section to the other. Then, it has information for each part of the time period. You have pictures, newspaper articles, names, essays, and other materials discussing the Civil War. And lastly, throughout the database it gives the credentials they have to show that they can look up this research and make a website about it. I would recommend this to any teacher, student, or person who is interested in this war and needs to research.

Bethel Digital Library

On November 10, 1960, Bethel College and Seminary’s president, Carl H. Lundquist, wrote a letter to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. In the letter he asks him if he is still coming to the college to speak on December 1st of that year. In the letter Mr. Lundquist mentions that there was some kind of controversy that happened recently to Dr. King. He also says that the school is hopeful that it was from God to “intensify the Christian spirit you have demonstrated so often in the past…”. More than likely there was some sort of act of bigotry that happened to Dr. King while he was in Atlanta, Georgia, which is where the letter is addressed to.

The letter that Mr. Lundquist writes also mentions that if Dr. King feels that the two speeches and luncheon is too much then he should say something. He also asks him what his plans are for travelling so that Bethel will be able to take care of him. Mr. Lundquist ends the letter with the following sentence: “Christian forces of America find an adequate solution to the race problem”. Also, in the November 23, 1960 edition of the “Clarion”, it states “Dr. King will address the group on the general topic of Race Relations at the morning convocation. In the evening he will speak on the topic, “Paul’s Epistle to Twentieth Century Christians.” The “Clarion also states “While Bethel and the audience may not share all of the ideas of our guests, we believe that they will help provide a stimulating climate for the vigorous intellectual growth that should characterize a Christian center of higher education”.

Image result for free to copy picture of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr

While everything seemed scheduled and nearly ready to go, something happened that made it impossible for Dr. King to make it to Bethel. This was very controversial because in the letter, it seems as if everything is ready to go and they just needed to finalize the visit. Something very serious must have happened for Dr. King for him to not be able to make it. There is also a possibility that there were just more important things to do than talk to a small private school in the middle of Minnesota. With this letter being written in the 1960’s, it is safe to assume that Dr. King knew that it was not appropriate to do a speech at a small college when race relations were so bad in the United States and he was the leader of the movement. Because of him being the leader of the civil rights movement, he probably had letters from nearly every college asking him to speak there. While Dr. King was obviously a very busy man, it still must have been embarrassing to Mr. Lundquist to say that plans were to have Dr. King come into Bethel and give a few speeches and have lunch, and then have Dr. King not be able to come in. It is very understandable for Dr. King to not be able to come to Bethel because there was just so much going on that he knew there were more important things to do, yet at the same time it is also understandable for Mr. Lundquist to be a little upset because the letter he wrote made it seem like it was going to happen and it only needed some finalizations, and then Dr. King was not able to make it. Mr. Lundquist probable had to jump quite a few hurdles just to be able to contact Dr. King and get it approved for him to come into the school, and then to have Dr. King not be able to make it must have been hard on him.

Digital Show & Tell: Fiction

Last week I shared a website that was based around the movie The Grand Budapest Hotel directed by Wes Anderson. I shared this website because I was thoroughly thrilled by the creative aspects throughout the whole website. I have not been able to figure out how they created different aspects of tools throughout the website, but it is definitely a lot of fun to play with.

Wes Anderson really opens his viewers up to the world that he has created for The Grand Budapest Hotel, and helps create a story outside of the movie, onto his website. This project may not be a digital humanities project, it still identifies key things that I think are important to remember for a digital humanities project:

  1. [They] should be knowledgeable and have plentiful research on their topic to have a clear focus.
    1. Wes Anderson has achieved this by creating lots of different aspects that give you more information behind things that happen in the movies. He includes documents of death certificates, and news clippings to show his research.
  2. Use tools in a productive way that will benefit the potential audience.
    1. The tools that Wes Anderson has included in this really open up the different ways that files can be viewed; being able to click on a photo and have it zoomed in and colorized helps bring life to the pieces that the audiences view.

These are important things to consider when documenting and creating a website based on history – or anything in general.

You can view the fictional site here: http://www.akademiezubrowka.com/

Chad DeSota Timeline

Hello, my name is Chad DeSota. This timeline was made to show each of the main pieces of technology that has influenced my life. It starts off fairly simple with an old computer with dial-up internet, to my first smart phone, and then finally to my college laptop. With each progressing item on this list, my knowledge increased about technology.

 

The Open Theism Debate of Bethel University

Starting from 1995 to the year 2000 there was a wide range of controversy revolving around
the idea of Open theism. The belief held that if God knew the past and present exhaustively,
but only knew the future partially. One pastor and faculty member at Bethel University, Greg Boyd that held this belief at Bethel was criticized by the prominent pastor, John Piper in the Bethel General Conference (BGC) using Tom Oden’s quote from “Christianity Today,” “The fantasy of God is ignorant of the future is a heresy and must be rejected.” Piper called that Boyd should be fired and have his pastorial Credentials revoked. The controversy led to a debate on November 30, 1999 in the RC gym.

Fig 1. Photograph of Gregory Boyd

In the RC gym, students and faculty gathered around to witness the theological debate. Boyd went up against Roger Thompson, a pastor of the Berean Baptist Church. He presented the argument of the classical view, one in opposition to open theism that argues that if God is truly infinite, nothing is “unknowable” to Him, including all future actions and events.

Fig 2. Photograph taken of the “Bethel Beyond the Boyd Debate” 

The faculty, staff and student responses were mixed. Nate Taylor (sophomore of Bethel) commented that “the presentation was open-ended and
was slightly disappointed.” Provost [currently President] Jay Barnes mentions that he was delighted with the responsiveness of students to come and pend several hours listening to discussion about theological issues. He also states, ” I was delighted with the quality, thoroughness and respectfulness of the presentations
done by Pastor Thompson and Dr. Boyd. I believe that the sessions helped us to continue thinking about this and helped students gain a deeper awareness of the importance and complexity of
these issues.” It appears even in the hostility form the situation regarding Boyd’s call of termination that the students and faculty were able to learn about the importance of debating theological views. A frustrated senior, Beth Howington says, “The forums Bethel has sponsored have been good to incite discussion within the student
body. However, it is disappointing that some, on both sides of the issue, have taken this issue beyond healthy debate, and it has begun to cause divisiveness among students…In two millennia, the issue of God’s foreknowledge has never reached a definitive conclusion, so why divide our campus over it?”

In the 2000 Bapist General Conference, the BGC Executive Minstry Team unanimously stated, “Be it resolved that we, the delegates of the Baptist General Conference (who are also the delegates of Bethel College and Seminary)* affirm that God’s knowledge of all past, present and future events is exhaustive; and, we also believe that the “openness” view of God’s foreknowledge is contrary to our fellowship’s historic understanding of God’s omniscience.” With this claim, the board do however acknowledge the debate regarding Open Theism is of critical importnace in seeking truth and unity. With this said, the BGC found Boyd within his boundaries to his belief, so he was able to stay at Bethel and keep his pastorial credentails. However due to the controversy Boyd later resigned himself.

SOURCES:

http://content.clic.edu/cdm/ref/collection/p16120coll18/id/13353
http://content.clic.edu/cdm/ref/collection/p15186coll6/id/8002
http://content.clic.edu/cdm/ref/collection/p15186coll6/id/8002

1994-2004, an Overview of the Debate on Open Theism in Evangelicalism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:GregBoyd.jpg

 

Covenant of Life Together

The Covenant for Life Together

                 Carl C. Lundquist

From the very beginning of our story, our leaders were always striving to create a community that reflects Jesus Christ. John Alexis Edgren was a man who continually trusted in Christ and aimed to integrate faith into education worked alongside Baptist General Conference which became a big part of what Bethel is. Likewise, Carl C. Lundquist was another leader who “would set the tone
and dynamic of the two schools for over a quarter of a century” (Spickelmier). This commitment brought the mission of Baptist General Conference (BGC) to Bethel. In 1965, Bethel moved to its Arden Hills location. The land was

beautiful and Lundquist wanted it to be a place to “foster a sense of community, and to advance the idea that ‘God is strong’ and is to be worshipped and served” (Spickelmier). After Lundquist’s presidency ended, George Brushaber was next but the BGC were skeptical of Brushaber because he wasn’t associated with BGC and had no connection to Bethel. Like previous leaders, Brushaber brought change to Bethel especially in the area of math and sciences unlike most other Christian colleges. Many other changes came as Bethel grew.

At first, the covenant was not called “The Covenant of Life Together”. It was called the “Lifestyle Statement”. It was essentially the same thing, except it was not as explicit as it is now. The Clarion 1982, Volume 57, Number 22, addresses the fact that the Lifestyle Statement was not clear in what it was trying to achieve. The statement was vague and gave off a negative feeling. Before this, the statement was not really written down. When applying to Bethel, this lifestyle was implied.

2004 Clarion Vol. 80 No. 6

Throughout the years, there have been many instances where there is conflict regarding the covenant. Jumping to more recent times, the 2004 Clarion Volume 80, No.6, gives a little insight to the times at Bethel. There was conflict in regards to alcohol and how the covenant played a role in that. The Clarion mentioned, “neighboring colleges have witnessed the erosive quality of alcoholism when lifting sanctions on consumption” (Clarion Vol. 80, No. 6). Jim Beilby suggested that there be a system where individuals could write personal lifestyle statements as a way to interact; “this would attempt to make Bethel a place where true interaction and growth would take place, rather than an institution strictly asserting rules” (Clarion Vol. 80, No. 6). In comparison to today, the covenant is grace-filled, peaceful, and a set of standards that the Bethel community holds themselves to. Faculty and staff clearly explain the intention of the covenant, in that it is not to be a set of rules that must be followed with severe consequences, rather that it is what sets the community apart from the world. That concept ties all the way back to our founders and leaders.

 

The covenant shapes and has been shaped to create the community known today. The Covenant of Life Together in 2017 Bethel culture is what we hold ourselves to. It helps us to be accountable to one another, to help each other grow, to reflect the image of Christ and to set us apart. It does not, nor should it, divide us but teach us to be graceful to one another the way God is graceful to us.

 

The Academic Catalog of 2009